Wednesday, February 29, 2012

"Time Out!" by Dave Barry







Melina Norris

AP Lang

Harmon

27 Feb. 2012

Better Late Than Never.

An Analysis of “Time Out!” by Dave Barry



            Dave Barry’s embellished fortitude exaggerates the stereotype that women are always late. Barry claims that a woman’s idea of being ‘on time’ is far different from a man’s. He employs hyperbole, satire, and ethos to justify his conclusion that it is genetically impossible for women to be on time.

Barry’s use of hyperbole delineates the misconception women have no concept of time whatsoever. “Women think there is WAY more time in the universe than men do,” a “scientific, statistically valid conclusion [Barry] reached by talking to some guys about their wives.” He

 qualifies the statement that women think there is more time in the universe than men do as a “scientific, statistically valid conclusion” simply because a few other men agreed with him. He classifies all women by his experience with his own wife who is prone to lateness. Because women believe “that the universe has plenty of time,” they interpret leaving for a party at “7:30 to mean ‘around 8,’ or more specifically, ‘9.” Barry fabricates the idea that when women are late, they are very late. Generally, no woman is going to allow herself to be one to two hours late for an event.



Barry utilizes satire to add humor to the stereotype that a woman’s perception of time is far different from a man’s. When catching a plane flight, men will always “factor in a ‘cushion’ to allow for the unexpected,” while women will “arrive at the airport as the plane was taking off” and ask what the hurry is because “the plane isn’t even halfway down the runway yet.” Barry’s sarcasm implies that women see nothing wrong with being late so much that they would arrive an airport to catch a flight as it was already “halfway down the runway.” Because women are often categorized as intelligently superior to men, Barry chooses to exalt one of the few flaws they possess to prove that, in this way, men are better. “I’m almost ready!’ ‘I’m just putting on my makeup!” are phrases commonly heard by men, but to them, “these two statements contradict each other.” “It’s like saying: ‘I’m very short! I’m 38 feet tall!” Barry uses this contradictory statement to emphasize the confusion forced upon men when women claim they’re almost ready, but have to do this or that first. His sarcasm reiterates his “factual” conclusion that the entire female population is physically incapable of being on time.

The ethos Barry uses allows the male readers to relate to his article. He pulls in situations that he himself, along with most all men, has endured with their own wife. “Every minute that a wife spends putting on makeup is experienced as 45 minutes by a husband who has reached the key-jingling stage.” Men can relate to pacing back in forth in agony waiting on their wives to finish getting ready. While women see a few short minutes as nothing, men are already starting to break a sweat. By the time 5 minutes have passed “the husband is a nervous wreck,” while the wife complains that he is rushing her. Barry conveys the animosity men have towards the female habit of tardiness through ethos. He draws men into the article relatable situations he has endured with his own wife.

           

            Barry’s use of hyperbole, satire, and ethos in “Time Out!” efficiently portray the widely known “fact” that women have no concept of time. By over emphasizing one of the few flaws of women, he places men, in this characteristic, as dominant.

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Kill 'Em! Crush 'Em! Eat 'Em Raw!

2. Paragraphs 5-7 compare and contrast football and war. Is this comparison convincing? How does the comparison appeal to logos?
Yes, the comparison between football and war is convincing because much of the terminology is similar. "Field general", "blitz", "front line", "the draft", etc. are all common language in war and football. McMurtry appeals to logos by expanding on the similarities of tactics and schemes war and football share.

3. In paragraph 9, the tone shifts. How is the shift achieved? Explain how the shift mirrors a transition in McMurtry's argument.
McMurtry achieves the shift by reminicsing on his own childhood memories of playing football for the sole reason of having fun. He describes the laughs he had running barefoot on an open green field with no one keeping score. McMurtry transitions from playing football for careless enjoyment to becoming routine and dangerous.

6. Consider the language of football, especially the words shared by the military. What sports other than football have a miliaristic side?
Many sports have characterisitics similar to the military. Soccer, Basketball, Rugby, Volleyball, etc. all have two sides fighting to achieve the same goal; winning. Additionally, they use tactics or "game plans" in order to figure out the best way to beat the other team.

7. Who is McMurtry's audience? Is it necessary for the reader to understand or care about football in order to understand what McMurtry is saying about society? Explain.
McMurtry's audience is anyone involved in football; parents, kids, coaches, etc. It isn't necessary for the reader to understand every aspect of football, but it is helpful to understand the physical hardships the game can cause to be able to relate to McMurtry's text.